
[Photo by TampereStreetStyle]
Being in love means that you admit that some1 else is the most important person in your life. You are there to protect your significant other, and if the scenario presented itself, you would be willing to die for them. This explains why the bro in this couple has a bullet belt. I know that I’ve been in some very serious relationships, and serious means willing to kill/die 4 ur bf/gf.
U also have 2 coordinate Halloween costumes with your siggyother. Do yall know if they are bikers, rockers, or the indie band JOUSTEECE?
/////COUPLE #2 /////////
“the couple who wear 1 another’s clothes’ = <3
Being in tru luv means that you aren’t afraid to be photographed with your signiffy other. Even if you are taking self-pix, part of u wants ur gf/bf in the pic since they are closely aligned with your personal brand/ur human accessory.
\\\\\COUPLE #3 \\\\\\\\
True alternative couples coordinate their outfits. Even if it is something as well-executed as wearing American Appy clothing that generates a peaceful colour scheme/sharing a general aesthetic, it goes a long way 2 prove that u rlly love 1 another.
SRSLY tho. What is tru luv? Will I ever find it? Do opposites attract, or do u need 2 find some1 who is basically the same as u?
Am I gonna marry a blog? Am I ghey, bi, or strate?
Should I get rid of my virginity or should I be abstinent?
What’s the difference between ‘havin sex’ & ‘making heart‘?




IAmCarles.com















25 Comments
@________________________@
Reply
you are a post-gay homo
Reply
the last couple, especially the girl, is not alt at alll. ughh.
Reply
exactly what i thought, schizo.
Reply
middle couple = altest couple alive. and really hot. i wonder if they’re on facebook/into threesomes?
Reply
Fuck you, feelings are a 2k3 thing. From when the Dashboard Confessionals were gonna be big. Also, the heteronormanitve couple is mereley an extension of capitalist production into the personal sphere. So really, being in a couple is the least alt thing imaginable.
Reply
//////////Reply by anom
//////////Posted March 15th, 2009 at 5:29 pm
@Anonymous, “the heteronormanitve couple is mereley an extension of capitalist production into the personal sphere”
elaborate. thatz a huge claim without a warrent.
Reply
dude, capitalism=alt, commies should be banned from blogs b4 they issue a five (blog) year plan for blog-producion.
Second couple is the altest couple.
Reply
the second one.
fer sure.
Reply
w/o capitalism altdom wouldnt exist.
Reply
douchebag
Reply
dayummmm the man in the second couple is wearing christopher kane
Reply
argh! can only see the image of the yellow smiley face couple/
Reply
lets cyber!
Reply
kill for them? no way. give them the last slice of pizza? maybe…
Reply
cant see any piccy’s
Reply
crls+blog=tru luv
Reply
There is nothing alt about being a natural blonde. That poorly-dressed skank in the third picture must’ve just jumped in for the photo.
I guess true love is finding someone on the street dressed as stupidly as you are, but not necessarily in the same way, cos opposites attract.
Reply
couple #2 is the altest, however they are not alive and therefore DQed
Reply
2nd couple is the cutest + altest of the three.
difference between sexytime and makin lessthanthree is that in the latter, two alts get past just being hot and sexy and screaming ironic shit in the sack, and start to actually care about the other person. they both appreciate the irony of it in that compromises massive altrntv egos…
AND THAT’S WHERE BABIES COME FROM.
american appy should make cum rags.
Reply
#2 FTW!
Reply
Let's make <3, and listen to Death from Above, m'kay? That's srsly ALT.
Reply
advantage, couple number two:
he dressed up as her and she dressed up as a charlie chaplin version of him. soo alt. <3<3
Reply
i <3 communism
Reply
the difference between 'havin sex' & 'making heart' is you being mnstrm or being alt fggt.
you choose.
say alt fggt.
it's better.
Reply
wth haha, that’s me and my girlfriend Kerry in the second image. Must have got it off our facebook. Flattered though.
Although question: how are we “not alive”?
Reply