>

Forecasting the Child Predator Glasses Economy

In 2k8, I was able to make tons of mediocre posts heavily relying on the strength of the gimmick of Child Predator glasses. I’m not so sure if 2k9 will be easy. We are slowly but surely reliving the product lifespan of shuttershades. s00 popular at the beginning, but then got rlllly inauthentic.

[photo by click/clash]
I think what we’re slowly realizing is that there’s more to a Child Predator aesthetic than just glasses. A Child Predator is a direct threat to society, and looking like a child predator is less of a ‘fashion choice’ and more of a lifestyle choice. A ChildPred can strike at any time without warning. There is a certain level of free-spiritedness and ‘I might kill U’ zaniness that we can see in the eyes of Authentic Child Preds.

Putting on the lenses of a child pred does not enable u 2 c the world that they see.

This entry-level alt is indicative of the increasing inauthenticity rates among people who have branded themselves’ with child pred glasses.

[via lookbook]
As soon as things reach the kids/entry-levelers, the personal brand image has been tarnished, rendering the look to be inauthentic for the next 7-10 years.

Maybe I am all wrong. Maybe the next wave of child predators will wear zany suspenders & kute white shoes to ‘appeal 2 young kids.’

I will miss u Child Predator glasses.
(miss u shuttershades)
/// help
Which glasses will be ‘next’?
Have yall heard of Wayfarers?

What is the future of the Modern Child Predator (Glasses)?
Will Child Predators be forced to Update their gimmick in order to appeal to modern kids?

This entry was posted in Street Fashion, Trends and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

24 Comments

  1. buaah
    Posted January 5, 2009 at 12:08 pm | Permalink

    first

    Reply

    //////////Reply by anony
    //////////Posted

    @buaah, fuck you. you should be strangled with your mouse and beaten to death with your keyboard.

    Reply

  2. Posted January 5, 2009 at 12:15 pm | Permalink

    Well, Wayfarers are so last year.

    Reply

    //////////Reply by Super Awesome Guy
    //////////Posted

    Finger Glasses are 2k9!

    http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3011/2780882119_0598c85ef4.jpg?v=0

    Reply

  3. geoff
    Posted January 5, 2009 at 12:28 pm | Permalink

    my personal sunglasses/face accesory brand revolves around aviators. are they hip/still hip/going to be hip? if they aren’t cool and I wear them with enough “confidence” will that make them cool because they’re not cool (like bingo)?

    Reply

    //////////Reply by pants
    //////////Posted

    @geoff, insecurity makes aviators cool. pride will make you look smug. u may hav to upgrade?

    Reply

  4. schizo
    Posted January 5, 2009 at 12:31 pm | Permalink

    wayfarers are so 50 years ago or whatevs

    oh did anyone see milk? the cute little queer with a white-fro was rocking some 70s child preds

    Reply

    //////////Reply by pants
    //////////Posted

    @schizo, yes, yeah, and yes

    Reply

  5. pascal
    Posted January 5, 2009 at 12:33 pm | Permalink

    the future is john lennon glasses with oversized lenses

    Reply

    //////////Reply by ruthie
    //////////Posted

    @pascal, Those are also called Windsor glasses. aka Jo Stalin, Groucho Marx, and Ernie Hemingway glasses. I agree, though (’bout the future).

    Reply

    //////////Reply by anonymissu
    //////////Posted

    @pascal, h8 lennon. sum1 should shoot dat bitch. stfu up about imagining stuff. u r not funny!!!!

    Reply

  6. what
    Posted January 5, 2009 at 12:35 pm | Permalink

    i need some help w/ this term ‘authenticity.’ i thawt that being ‘authentic’ meant doing/saying/listenin 2/wearing what U want and what makes U hppy…

    how can somethin lose ‘authenticity’ just because other ppl started incorporating it 2 their personal brand?

    Reply

    //////////Reply by anony
    //////////Posted

    @what, I’ll skip the standard “you must be new here” and just say that HRO is just one long running inside joke and sometimes it’s not even that funny…. but the times when it is is what keeps people coming back.

    Reply

  7. Tea
    Posted January 5, 2009 at 12:39 pm | Permalink

    H.R.G.’s. Horn Rimmed Glasses. Trust.

    Reply

    //////////Reply by moi
    //////////Posted

    @Tea, i wear horn rims… how unfortunate for me.

    Reply

  8. HipToDeath
    Posted January 5, 2009 at 1:02 pm | Permalink

    I don’t understand why Carles has to write like a 12 year old girl on aim. His posts would be just as funny/unfunny if he spelled words out completely. Mocking somebody is much more satisfying when people think you’re being 100% serious.

    Reply

    //////////Reply by johnnytantan
    //////////Posted

    @HipToDeath, stfu and gtfu

    Reply

    //////////Reply by HipToDeath
    //////////Posted

    @johnnytantan, No you!

    Reply

    //////////Reply by HipToDeath
    //////////Posted

    P.S. Did you mean gtfo and just hit u by accident/out of habit? Or do you just want me to stand up?

    Reply

    //////////Reply by pants
    //////////Posted

    @HipToDeath, ha! and i disagree with ur first point.

    //////////Reply by anony
    //////////Posted

    @HipToDeath, We think it’s more fun to not know if it’s completely serious or not. Sometimes it’s so serious that it’s not serious. The experienced HRO reader knows how to read between the lines. I’m glad HRO doesn’t come with a FAQ. There are too many douchebags already.

    Reply

    //////////Reply by HipToDeath
    //////////Posted

    @anony, It’s mockery, of course it’s not serious. When was the last time you “seriously” mocked somebody? If you were being serious, then it wouldn’t be mockery. My point is that it’s much more effective/satisfying when people do take you seriously. In which case, typing like a 12 year old girl is counter productive.

    Reply

  9. THENATTYBROS
    Posted January 5, 2009 at 1:08 pm | Permalink

    u r so sexy when ur vulnerable

    Reply

    //////////Reply by anony
    //////////Posted

    @THENATTYBROS, It’s an interesting quality is it not? and we all try so hard not be vulnerable.

    Reply

  10. malt liquor
    Posted January 5, 2009 at 1:38 pm | Permalink

    Boys Keep Swinging!

    Reply

  11. anon@non.com
    Posted January 5, 2009 at 1:45 pm | Permalink

    boooooorrrrrrrrrring…

    Reply

  12. anonymous
    Posted January 5, 2009 at 2:19 pm | Permalink

    HOLY SHIT!

    First time someone I have met before is on HRO!
    Dudes name is Pete Bradley.

    Reply

    //////////Reply by anoni
    //////////Posted

    @anonymous,

    his name is robert paulson

    Reply

  13. Adam West
    Posted January 5, 2009 at 3:26 pm | Permalink

    Have yall heard of Wayfarers? many lolz

    Reply

  14. Rene
    Posted January 5, 2009 at 3:53 pm | Permalink

    These glasses are mainstream now. I don’t want to be all “I was wearing them before they were famous/ I was listening to that band before you” but when I tried to get a pair on eBay I couldn’t. Now there are hundreds of sellers.

    I bought mine from a market in Barcelona. THAT’S how goddam alt I am.

    Reply

    //////////Reply by anony
    //////////Posted

    @Rene, I’ve been wearing them since before e-bay existed so there….ok not really…. speaking of which Barcelona just signed to Warner… or Universal or something. Does that mean they suck now or have they always sucked?

    Reply

  15. Posted January 5, 2009 at 8:22 pm | Permalink

    lolwut?! No rapist glasses link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVcyNANK5cY

    Reply

  16. Double J
    Posted January 5, 2009 at 8:24 pm | Permalink

    Martin Margiela has decided the future of sunglasses:

    http://www.jakandjil.com/Fashion/MaisonMartinMargiela.SS08.html

    Shuttershades – out
    Being blind – So so in

    Reply

    //////////Reply by adamson
    //////////Posted

    @Double J, those glasses are so 2011.5

    Reply

  17. d
    Posted January 5, 2009 at 9:15 pm | Permalink

    my up and coming indie band was on tour a few weeks ago and played a show where the venue guy was wearing child predator glasses and a flannel shirt. it made me think of hro.

    Reply

  18. anonymissu
    Posted January 5, 2009 at 9:39 pm | Permalink

    i only trust a ped who can show his face aka with no glasses.

    also – kids make fun of ppl with glasses. “4 eyes,” ne1? they won’t want to make sex with some1 who is a nerd. he needs to dress like dora the fucking explorer. that be alt/get him laid.

    Reply

  19. muuuuush
    Posted January 5, 2009 at 9:54 pm | Permalink

    are all glasses with fake lenses ChildPred Glasses???

    Reply

  20. Posted January 5, 2009 at 11:13 pm | Permalink

    Justice should start wearing the Wayfarers with the pointy edges. They are the best.
    haha :)

    Reply

  21. Entry level alt
    Posted January 6, 2009 at 2:42 am | Permalink

    Have CP glasses gone mainstream cause of the buddy holly types??????? Are they still gonna be in after Y2K???????

    Reply

  22. jonaphant
    Posted January 7, 2009 at 2:18 pm | Permalink

    help, i need some glasses (for sure)
    so which ones should i buy?

    Reply

  23. Tar
    Posted January 7, 2009 at 9:59 pm | Permalink

    soooo glad I never hopped on the eyewear bandwagon. never did shuttershades or lens-less frames or perv goggles.

    just played it safe with my rayba-OH FUCK.

    Reply

  24. blurhg
    Posted January 12, 2009 at 6:21 pm | Permalink

    Late to the party, but those aren’t child predator glasses they’re wearing, they’re 80s “nerd glasses” like you’d see in a documentary about accountants or Wall Street number crunchers. They’re also dressed like nerds of that era. It works.

    You have no idea what you’re talking about, do you? I bet HRO HEADQUARTERS is like a cabin in Alaska.

    Reply

Post a Comment, Yall!

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*