I just bought my iPod nano a few months ago because of the new emerging artist featured in the commercial called ‘The Feists.’ Even though the song ‘wasn’t THAT good’, it was a commercial that turned her into an altMainstream superstar.

Her crossbranding with a technological product enabled every1 to feel progressive by enjoying her/the small iPod nano.

LET US NEVER FORGET THE ‘FEIST-SIZED’ IPOD NANO MODEL.
LET US ALL ADMIT THAT ‘1-2-3-4′ WASN’T EVEN A VERY GOOD SONG.
Srsly. It reminds me of ‘girls who dress alt but don’t have any personality’ would listen to/rave about/put into their facebook+myspace profile.

It’s good to know that iPod does a good job of lumping ‘obscurer alternative artists’ and ‘artists who were originally marketed as being alternative but have since gained a mainstream appeal’ into their [BUZZWORTHY] commercials.

Is it deceptive advertising that the new Nanos begin to ‘cum’ in the final 10 seconds of the commercial?

I think Apple would tell you that more ‘variety’ is better when it comes to colour choices. However, according to the ‘Pinkifying a Product Makes Your Product Less Authentic’ theory, Apple might be weakening it’s brand by enabling empty females to ‘feel like their pink iPod truly represents them’ while they work out at the gym.

It’s sort of like when ur fave sports team makes various coloured jerseys for women (pink) or St. Patrick’s Day (green), and u wish they could just ’stay authentic’ instead of trying s00 hard 2 sell jerseys.

BUT SRSLY…
Does n e 1 miss the bulkiness/minimalist interface of the early iPods? the ‘mini’ was s00 bulky!

I read in a tumblr that minimalist, ‘no bullshit’ designs+interfaces are gonna be big after a disease wipes out half of the Eastern world in 2k10.