<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HIPSTER RUNOFF &#187; Those Dancing Days</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hipsterrunoff.com/tag/those-dancing-days/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hipsterrunoff.com</link>
	<description>A &#34;Culturally Relevant&#34; &#34;Blog Worth Blogging About.&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:15:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Bands that Sound Okay and Look Cute are typically destined for big things</title>
		<link>http://www.hipsterrunoff.com/2008/06/bands-that-sound-okay-and-look-cute-are-typically-destined-for-big-things.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.hipsterrunoff.com/2008/06/bands-that-sound-okay-and-look-cute-are-typically-destined-for-big-things.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bands that look kute and sound okay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MGMT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Those Dancing Days]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altville.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/bands-that-sound-okay-and-look-cute-are-typically-destined-for-big-things/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has any one heard of this band THOSE DANCING DAYS ?They look like an all-alt-girl band that was assembled by a coalition of alternative retail executives. 
They &#8216;look rlly kute&#8217; and &#8217;sound okay.&#8217;  And by &#8217;sound okay&#8217; means that &#8216;I would never listen to it, but I could understand why a mass market could [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has any one heard of this band <span style="font-weight:bold;">THOSE DANCING DAYS</span> ?<br />They look like an all-alt-girl band that was assembled by a coalition of alternative retail executives. </p>
<p>They &#8216;look rlly kute&#8217; and &#8217;sound okay.&#8217;  And by &#8217;sound okay&#8217; means that &#8216;I would never listen to it, but I could understand why a mass market could pretend that it is good music.&#8217;  I wonder if they are big in other parts of the world?  When am I going to be ambushed by remixes of them?</p>
<p>Another band that I think &#8216;looks kute&#8217; and &#8217;sound interesting to uninteresting people who like to be into alt music&#8217; is MGMT.  They&#8217;re pretty decent for the most part, but overall, pretty gimmicky.  But I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re trying to be gimmicky, I think they&#8217;re just weirdos, and their weirdo-ness is being exploited in a gimmicky way.</p>
<p>For example, there&#8217;s this new video for &#8220;Electric Feel&#8221; that got cleaned up because it looks like they wanted it to be on VH1 or something.
<div></div>
<p>I think they should have hired the visionaries behind the OK GO &#8216;walking on treadmills&#8217; gimmick, because this song could have been soo random/viral.</p>
<p>Remember the old video for &#8220;Electric Feel&#8221;?</p>
<p>At least they were adamant about relaying their image of &#8216;being weird/psychedelic&#8217;, involving underworlds with creatures, and utilizing green screens.  I wonder if Columbia Records told them &#8216;that looks waaay too Dan Deacony.&#8217;<br />&lt;3 when artists stand up for their visions &lt;3</p>
<p>&#8220;This band looks interesting, and if I ever had a conversation about them, I could relate their look and sound to a time in the past where a lot of stuff sounded like them.&#8221;  -music fan who reads stereogum once a week and thinks he is s00 underground<br /><img src="http://i223.photobucket.com/albums/dd120/hipsterrunoff/g11mgmt.jpg"></p>
<p>Are there any other bands that look and sound kute/interesting/&#8217;different&#8217;/'revivalist&#8217; who could be considered underwhelming products?  I feel like the whole glue behind these types of bands/products is that they are inoffensive and accessible, which can sometimes be a good thing, but can also lead to &#8216;being overexposed by rcrd lbls who market stuff to people.&#8217;</p>
<p>Also, there&#8217;s the I-Think-I-Am-A-Good-Person-bc-I-See-the-Big-Picture argument that &#8216;this music is good compared to what most people are exposed to, so it&#8217;s good that people get really into stuff. Just bc u listen to way too much music doesn&#8217;t mean u r better than every1.&#8217;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really have a problem with <span style="font-weight:bold;">&#8216;bands that sound okay&#8217; and &#8216;look kute&#8217;</span>, but I guess it&#8217;s easy to get burnt out on them when people confuse them with <span style="font-weight:bold;">meaningful-core bands</span> and/or <span style="font-weight:bold;">highly-bloggable gimmick bands</span>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hipsterrunoff.com/2008/06/bands-that-sound-okay-and-look-cute-are-typically-destined-for-big-things.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
